Jun
30

Douchebag Vanity Fair Writer Interviews Erin Andrews, Enrages Sports Blogosphere

By on June 30, 2010 at 10:15 am

Sports blogosphere, at my signal, unleash hell.

I don’t make it a regular habit of reading Vanity Fair, probably because I do not belong to the societal subset of mindless sycophants who believe that they can curry favor with the upper crust by simply being seen reading that rag at airports, upscale coffee shops and bathhouses by way of it helping them appear sophisticated and cosmopolitan.

Thankfully, despite my desire to not waste my time critiquing the drivel contained within what should be considered the periodical equivalent of a boiling hot coffee colonic, I would be remiss not to at least address and mercilessly rip – as other colleagues of mine already have – the douchetardery exhibited by Vanity Fair contributing editor George Wayne in his interview of Erin Andrews, “Views from a Sideline.”

To be honest, I have no earthly idea what Wayne was trying to pull off with his offensive and immature line of questioning of Andrews. Perhaps he was trying to be “edgy” or “provocative” during the interview, but instead of achieving whatever his ill-conceived goals were, Wayne comes off as an egotistical, elitist, patronizing and and downright crude asshole journalist who apparently prefers to be the center of attention instead of the subject he is interviewing. In a word, this abomination is utterly reprehensible.

If you take the time to read the entire article, you will most assuredly notice that Wayne conducts the interview with a prevailing tone of condescension for his subject and a flippant air of superiority over Andrews, but instead of reviewing everything here, I’ll simply highlight the most moronic questions he poses to her.

Do you have man-size feet like Paris Hilton? You know, she can find shoes to fit her only in the “tranny” section of the shoe store.

No, I wear a size-7 shoe, and I am five feet ten inches.

There are few ways to better ingratiate yourself to your interview subject than by making a veiled transvestite reference about them. Stellar work, Wayne.

He then wisely moves away from comparing Andrews to RuPaul but cannot pull himself away from being some kind of fancy boy smart ass as he suggests her relationship and the extent of it with her Dancing with the Stars partner, Maksim Chmerkovskly, was nothing more than fodder for the tabloids:

I’m sure you have toned perfectly, too, with all that dancing. But what gets me to the vomitorium is that faux romance between you and that cheesy ballroom-dancing partner of yours. What was with this tabloid fake romance?

Do you know him?

I don’t need to know him to find him cheesy, honey.

Well, all I know is he was a wonderful dance partner and a wonderful human being who looked out for me, who would call me each night after practice to see if I was O.K.

Well, if this dickstick finds him cheesy, Erin, what could you have possibly been thinking? Honey.

And then, right smack dab in the middle of the interview, Wayne poses this unbelievably inappropriate and useless question:

What is the one thing you take when feeling constipated?

Are you really going to write about that? I’m not going to comment on that. That is kind of weird and I don’t feel comfortable answering that question. I have gone through so much in the last year.

Seriously, WTF? I don’t even think Howard Stern would have had the balls to ask a person like Erin Andrews that question. Even Stern has more integrity than that. What was the point of even asking that? Did this retard expect her to seriously answer the question? Or did he simply want to make her extremely uncomfortable. That’s some bush league stuff right there, man. Classless.

Finally, and I am skipping around a bit in the interview, but here is one of the questions he asks Andrews towards the beginning of the interview:

What’s the one thing you hate about yourself?

I always second-guess what I am doing.

Indeed. And I am absolutely certain Andrews was doing a whole helluva lot of second guessing regarding why she even agreed to participate in this miscarriage against journalism which this asshole passes off as an interview.

One thing I will give Vanity Fair a pittance of credit for is the excellent photo shoot one of their photographers did with Andrews. And why would I give those jerkoffs any page views the benefit of pageviews by linking to them when I can instead simply upload them here? So, here you go.

Tasteful, yet subtly sexy. Still, I am certain there will be more than one self-righteous windbag media type who will criticize Andrews and hammer her for vainly taking advantage of her looks. Although I will be happy to condemn them when they do so, they are ignorant and jealous and just don’t know any better.

Views from a Sideline [Vanity Fair]
Vanity Fair Dickhead Writer Questions Erin Andrews: “What Do You Take When Feeling Constipated?” [Busted Coverage]

Categories : Media

Comments

  1. Clearly, he was trying to “neg” her with these questions so she’d be more talkative and go out on a date with him.

  2. Bluenatic says:

    I wonder what Wayne’s fellow contributing editor at Vanity Fair, H.G. “Buzz” Bissinger, thinks of this interview. It’s pretty clear to me, from the cruel tone of Wayne’s questions, that he hasn’t read much W.C. Heinz.

  3. Upstate Underdog says:

    Something tells me George Wayne doesn’t like pretty ladies.

  4. MNBonnie says:

    Weed, may I call you Weed? ;)

    EXCELLENT job! Great column and I completely agree. I will forever be in your debt when I work douchetardery into my vocabulary from now on. I can’t think of a better word to describe the crap this POS Vanity Fair refers to as an interview. And yes, if this douchebag doesn’t like Maks, you know for sure Maks is the terrific, wonderful guy we all know him to be. This George idiot wouldn’t know what a decent guy is, because he’s apparently a bottom-feeder himself.

  5. Mockbou says:

    Is this interviewer the same windbag who did the RS McCrystal interview?

  6. malgorzata says:

    Mr. Wayne, you are an ugly human being. You do not deserve any readership. Shame on you.

  7. LeNoceur says:

    The correct answer to that question:

    “I have no idea. I’m just a regular girl.”

  8. John says:

    Weed against Speed, you’re every bit as much of a douchetard as any of the targets of your rants. *You’re* no success as a journalist and I doubt your success with women is any better for your pretending to wave the feminist flag by supporting models in their choice of ‘career’. I’m no supporter of feminism myself but *genuinely* intelligent women (as opposed to air-headed models) who were at the vanguard of the Women’s Movement between the 70′s and 2000 all recognised that women who made sex objects of themselves weren’t doing themselves or any other women any favours. From your comments it’s clear that you would think this army of feminists were all wrong to object to women demeaning themselves for low-browed savages to leer at and drool over. Yes, it’s true that since pornography really took off with the arrival of the internet, these feminists went the way of the dodo (as it became increasingly embarrassing for them to try to lay the blame for all the classless hussies parading themselves everywhere on some mythical, misogynistic ‘patriarchal conspiracy’), but the fact remains that models are no better than brain-dead primitives pandering to their male equivalents.

    It beggars belief that you have the gall to call anyone self-righteous given the tone of the prattle you spew forth.
    Then, you’d call those photographs “Tasteful”? They are classic examples of the type of imagery that makes it impossible for women to be taken seriously.

    Don’t get me wrong. I *don’t* take women seriously and I won’t start doing so until they stop ‘taking advantage of their looks’. I’ve discovered (along with the feminists) that women are happy to objectify themselves; they love it and do it every chance they get. I even believe the women who speak out against models are secret hypocrites who never get found out purely because they can’t get such ‘work’. Unlike you, however, I have the strength of character to treat such women with the contempt they deserve rather than brown-nose to them in a vain attempt to elevate your sex life to something a step up from the whacking material your favourite women aspire to be.

  9. Larry says:

    Yup. He sounds like a real asshole to me too. Maybe Erin should have punched his lights out, then we’re really have a headline. Oh, and congrats to VF for doing their usual shity job of publishing anything
    but actual journalism. Well done!!!

  10. Old King Clancy says:

    George Wayne sounds like a pseudonym for Rolling Stone uberdouche Erik Hedegaard.

Leave a Reply